On 15th January 2015 we met other Domaine de la Romanee-Conti agents from around the world in Vosne-Romanee to taste the 2012 vintage from bottle.
With 1 hour in the glass beforehand on the second morning, the wines were ready to taste…
I have not commented on the colours here for two reasons:
1) I am not good at it, and
2) In all honesty I do not feel it tells you a great deal at this stage
My overriding impression is of wines with a wonderful balance of fruit density and proper/serious structure. I imagine the vast majority will close down a fair bit in the next 2–3 years – this appears to be a vintage for the long-term, like the 2010s. While there will be charm early on, I think these wines need – and demand – time. More so than 2007, 2009, and 2011, for instance.
No Vosne-Romanee 1er Cru ‘Duvault-Blochet’ was made in 2012 (nor in 2013). You may think that this would come as a disappointment (my personal blog makes it fairly clear…) but in honesty I like that it is not made each year. One day I would love to sit down and taste them all…
Here are my tasting notes:
Charming, quite dark fruit, the nose is true to Corton but with charm. You can feel the whole bunch vinification. The palate at this stage does not have the density, nor depth, of fruit that you get from the nose. There is good grip but it is not overpowering. Complexity will come with time for sure.
On re-visiting at the end of the tasting and with more air the forest fruits were coming out.
My score: 17–17.5
A shade reductive, which I like, lovely ‘complete’ nose with an earthy element – multidimensional. There is fruit and as usual for the Domaine’s Echezeaux it is red. It releases more and more with the air and swirling. The palate is red fruited also, more delicately but it grows. There is a good structure, not harsh but definite, very grown-up. I like this a lot, a very good Echezeaux.
On re-visiting at the end of the tasting and with more air it became more decadent and of course less reductive. The fruit is ever so slightly degraded, real complexity – I’m very impressed.
My score: 18.5+
Less animal and more primary than Echezeaux in character, though less expressive, may be the most muted of all the wines in this tasting. Very complete, quite brooding and serious, alluring and academic.
On re-visiting at the end of the tasting and with more air it made me think that this will go more to the savoury end of the spectrum in time.
My score: 18–18+
I seem to love this wine more and more each year. I also think the purity of fruit character is the closest to that of Romanee-Conti itself. Mellow yet precise red fruits hit you. There is a light freshness of orange peel as well. Easier to assess and easier to love than Grands Echezeaux. To counter the red fruit there is a gentle white pepper spice that I often find in Romanee-Saint-Vivant, it never overpowers but always balances the fruit. Very poised and attractive on the nose. It is through the seriousness of the palate that I think really marks the outstanding quality of this wine. Whilst the nose makes you flirt with it the palate makes you sit up and pay attention. There is a depth of minerality on the palate that lifts the complexity of the wine and makes it so moreish, a persistent and fine structure here that almost goes unnoticed but is there as a serious frame to the lovely fruit. As might be obvious I have really rather fallen for this wine.
On re-visiting I was delighted to have all the above confirmed. This is a superb Romanee-Saint-Vivant – seriousness to balance the attractiveness.
My score: 18.5–19
Tasting and revelling in the differences between Romanee-Saint-Vivant and Richebourg is one of the greatest parts of any tasting with the Domaine’s wines. Darker-fruit, more cherried and with some damson there is a certainty about Richebourg, a rugged confidence, just short of swagger and so it is here. The palate shows a little less weight of fruit than the nose, not quite so brooding, more charm. The structure is clear but ripe.
On revisiting I found the biggest difference of all the wines: some animal, a little graphite and cool savoury minerality as well as a good structure – may be the sleeper?
My score: 18–18.5+
I got a tiny note of ‘grain’ or as I noted, popcorn ‘unpopped’… immediately the glass was swirled it went. La Tache is so often the ‘confident senior sibling’ and so it was here. The glass that was most empty at the end of the tasting. I often find this the hardest to describe but then tend to waffle. There is an earthy power, some links to Echezeaux here, that is very La Tache. This is expressively complex, more ‘sharp minded Bon Viveur’ less the ‘intense academic’… There is a lovely structure, a little mouth-watering dryness that leads to a dash of pepper (pink not white), herbs and gentle spice. With more air it gets more complete and harder to describe, this is a serious La Tache for the long term but as ever it is also charming and welcoming.
On re-visiting the above was simply confirmed.
My score: 18.5–19+
The lift of fruited excellence that you see in Romanee-Saint-Vivant with some of the earthy complexity in the background that was evident in Echezeaux and La Tache – lovely. A striking balance of black and red fruits, powerful and brooding yet not too closed or too tense. This is serious, a keeper. There is sweetness but it is kept in check with a persistent and definite, if lightly worn, structure. To say the integration of the fruit, structure and texture is perfect is too technical but so true.
On revisiting there is so much depth and complexity, near perfect.
My score: 19.5+
The colour is confusing as everything is there, flashes of green, yellow, gold even. Real power and almost a spritz of youth. There are notes of brine and lowland malt mixed with white flowers and yellow fruits that stop just short of the tropical. The palate is so lively, so driven and focused, as was commented there is an almost Corton-Charlemagne tension like, verve and drive to the attack then the tongue is left in no doubt that this is Montrachet. There is an impression of sweetness and a textural weight to come. My hand written notes finish with “Epic potential”. This may well be a legend…so sad that there is so little but may be that plays a part?
My score: 19–20
One additional observation:
Were I to pair the reds on the basis of similarities of overall character it would be easy to my mind:
Corton with Richebourg
Echezeaux with La Tache
Romanee-Saint-Vivant with Romanee-Conti
As always, a privilege to taste the whole line-up and even more so to do it in Vosne-Romanee itself.